|
printer friendly version (pdf) Beautiful Terrors—George MacDonald and Lilith
In the 1871 children's fantasy At the Back of the North Wind, George MacDonald's boy hero Diamond is asked what he thinks of a story. He replies, without hesitation, that "any story always tells me itself what I'm to think about it."2 (The story, or what little we hear of it, is The Princess and the Goblin—which MacDonald would publish the following year.) Prophetically, and perhaps unwittingly, the author here foresees the root cause of his own critical neglect. Remote from the mainstream of 19th century fiction, the works of George MacDonald are explicable in their own terms or not at all. Literary critics, who cut up and distort a text to fit the theory du jour, tend to shy away from MacDonald. His work defies such treatment and, ultimately, defeats it. For all his perceived naiveté, he is a more difficult author than Henry James. It is conundrum typical of the man himself. Throughout his long and varied life (1824 to 1905) George MacDonald made a career out of not fitting in. The son of a farming family in Aberdeenshire, he wound up a professor at King's College, London—on close terms with the Victorian intellectual élite. Starting his career as a Congregationalist minister, he resigned after two years when his unorthodox views clashed irreconcilably with those of his parishioners. Lionised in the United States and offered a lucrative parish in Boston, he moved instead to Italy to live on a tiny pension from Queen Victoria. His realistic novels, widely read in their day, now lie more or less forgotten. His fantasy works (which puzzled and disturbed friends like John Ruskin) continue to awe readers and have 'influenced' (if that's the word) such modern-day giants as C. S. Lewis, J. R. R. Tolkien and Philip Pullman.
Yet a 'great literary work' is what Lilith undoubtedly is. Few other texts in English have approached its hallucinatory and hypnotic power. MacDonald, it seems, is not so much telling us a story as mining his reader's subconscious—laying bare the fears and desires that lurk beneath the surface of other books, but are rarely allowed to break through. (To find a dream narrative of comparable power, I would have to turn to "Klingsohr's Tale" from Henry von Ofterdingen by the German poet and mystic Novalis—who was MacDonald's lifelong model and inspiration—or the prose poems in Les Illuminations by the French enfant terrible Arthur Rimbaud.) The sheer imaginative force of Lilith makes nonsense of our everyday notions of 'good writing'. MacDonald aims not to make us read, but to make us dream. Could this be why the book's hero Mr. Vane (a name predictably loaded with symbolism) starts his story as a virtual prisoner of his own library? Narrating in the first person, Vane tells how his library has "like an encroaching state, absorbed one room after another until it occupied the greater part of the ground floor."3 Books are taking over his physical and mental space, yet the reading of books will never cure his overpowering isolation and anguish. The secret lies in a "mutilated volume", from which a workman has "cut away diagonally a considerable portion, and fixed the remnant" in a "masked door" disguised as a bookshelf.4 In other words, a book that can never be read or understood in conventional terms. [...] This article has 2 pages. Go on to page 2 or view the entire article. 1 George MacDonald, "The Fantastic Imagination" in U.C. Knoepflmacher ed. The Complete Fairy Tales (London, 1999) p. 7. 2 George MacDonald, At the Back of the North Wind (Wilder Publications, 2008) p.195. 3 George MacDonald, Lilith, (Allison and Busby, 1987) pp. 7-8. 4 Ibid. p. 9. |